![poser debut clothing does not fit model poser debut clothing does not fit model](https://images.summitmedia-digital.com/esquiremagph/images/2020/01/28/DIOR-MEN-SS20-KEY-LOOK-05.jpg)
![poser debut clothing does not fit model poser debut clothing does not fit model](http://piesandplots.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ford-car.jpg)
- Poser debut clothing does not fit model how to#
- Poser debut clothing does not fit model software#
- Poser debut clothing does not fit model professional#
The most logical reason for the Poser-bashing is probably the simplest: professional jealousy. If you’re spending this much time on a project, you don’t have time to spend in any forums, let alone the Poser community forums.īesides, would these elitists believe that a new user called “AndrewS” was really the director of Pixar movies? Or would they laugh him off as some “poser” (pun intended)? This argument is pretty absurd as well, but let me just say this: real professionals are the ones who work 8, 9, or 10 hours a day (or more) to finish their deadlines. In fact, once you’ve seen the Poser figures a few times, you can easily spot them in almost any setting.Īnother argument put forth by the elitists is that no “professionals” post messages in the Poser community forums therefore, the logic goes, if there are no professionals posting in the forums, there must not be any professionals at all. If you read newspapers like USA Today, you’ll commonly see the Poser figures used in the illustrations. There’s a family sitting in the seats… and guess what the figures are? Yep, the Adult Male, Adult Female, Male Child, and Female Child that come with Poser 4.Īnd we all know how unprofessional the artists and engineers at Walt Disney World are, especially for using a program like Poser. Hmm… I guess this means ILM isn’t “professional” if they’re using Poser.Īt Epcot’s Spaceship Earth attraction (at Walt Disney World in Orlando, FL), there is an animation of the ride vehicles rotating in space.
Poser debut clothing does not fit model how to#
This storyboard helped the artists at Industrial Light and Magic (ILM) figure out how to block their shot, where to position the camera, and how background figures would be positioned in the scene. Here’s one example: In the book, The Art of Star Wars: Episode II, I saw a screen shot of a pre-visualization storyboard which used the human figures found in Poser. What the elitists never see is how many real, professional studios use Poser. This would be like me saying, “My parents don’t use Poser and none of my friends’ parents use Poser.” Therefore, by this logic, my statement must obviously mean, “No parents in the entire world use Poser.” One of the worst arguments I’ve seen is when one of these elitists says something like “I know plenty of professionals and none of them use Poser”, as if to say, “Since I personally don’t know any ‘professionals’ who use Poser, then no professionals in the entire world use Poser.” Is it fair to say that every cell-phone camera is bad simply because some photos aren’t very good? With so many people taking pictures with their cell-phones, can these photos be considered “art”? Probably not, but maybe some are. As we speak, more and more people have cameras available to them, usually on their cell-phones. Like anything in life, some people will have the talent to make good images, while some people won’t.Īs an aside, I think Poser images can be compared to photography. While I will agree that a lot of Poser-created images are amateur in nature, you have to look at the “big picture”: since Poser is inexpensive, fairly easy to use, and doesn’t require a super-computer, it’s only natural that a wide variety of people would use the software.
Poser debut clothing does not fit model software#
Many elitists also claim that Poser images show a distinct “amateur-ness”, which obviously means that the software itself is amateurish. Do they really mean that if I use an “unprofessional” software program, I can no longer call myself a “professional”? How’s that for circular logic? These elitists claim (usually with specious logic) that “professionals” don’t use Poser simply because it’s “unprofessional”. For this discussion, I’ll be calling these “professionals” by the more-correct term of “elitists”, which will mean “people who look down on something for their own personal reasons”. These people tend to look down on the use of Poser simply because they don’t use it, don’t understand it, or more-often-than-not, because they just don’t like it. However, many people seem to think that Poser is “unprofessional” because of its low price, its low learning curve, and the “amateur-ness” of many images made by beginners. The learning curve for Poser is a lot less steep than that of more complex graphics programs. Poser’s low price (normally in the $250 range) and included content (models, clothing, poses, etc) allow almost anyone to quickly make digital images immediately after purchasing and installing the software. Why do elitists look down on the use of Poser?Īs an introduction, Poser is a “3D Character and Scene Design” graphics software program created by Ghost Effects, then sold to and upgraded by MetaCreations, then sold to and upgraded by e-frontier, and then sold to and upgraded by Smith Micro (link opens in new window).